(Jamma) Betting. The Lazio Regional Administrative Court rejected the annulment, subject to the adoption of precautionary measures, of the provision with which the Aams decreed the forfeiture of concession no. 4019, together with supplementary deed no. 15158, owned by Bet For Bet…

To read this article

Log in or register

Previous articleAvv. Anastasia: “Law n. 190/2014: the Concessionaires insist on enforcing the sureties, the guarantors must raise the "exceptio doli generalis' in order not to damage the managers"
next articlePirrello (AGGE): "If gambling really hurts why isn't it completely eliminated by offering the possibility of converting the offer into kindergartens and playrooms?"

Related ArticlesOthers by editorial staff