Stability. Suppressed the amendment for the 14% Preu

(Jamma) It was suppressed ( confirming the advance rumors about Jamma) the paragraph of the maxi-amendment to the Stability law which provided for an upward adjustment for the Preu on slots, setting it at 14% starting from January 2014. The Government's coordination proposal, approved by the Senate, in fact asked for the cancellation of paragraphs 133 to 137 and 379 (the latter was the one that concerned the Preu), "since the corresponding provisions are already present in paragraph 132 in the version approved by the Commission with amendment 4.2000/24 ​​(text 2)".

However, the amendment in question does not concern the taxation of gaming machines, but the payment of socially useful workers in the Calabria Region. However, the provisions concerning horse payments and concessions for the game of Bingo remain confirmed.

Next Tuesday, December 3, the process of the stability law in the Chamber will begin in the Budget Committee. This was decided by the bureau of the commission, which set the deadline for presenting the amendments on Thursday 5 December at 15 pm. The examination of the amendments that will be judged admissible will begin on Tuesday 10 December, with the aim of closing the work in the commission the following week.

The proposal approved by the Senate is as follows:

C1

 

The government

 

Approved

 

To amendment 1.900:

 

        Suppress paragraphs 133 to 137 and paragraph 379 as the corresponding provisions are already present in paragraph 132 in the version approved by the Commission with amendment 4.2000/24 ​​(text 2).

 

        In paragraph 199, after the words: "administer" enter the following: «amounts above in separate management based on the criteria approved by decree of the President of», which are skipped due to a mere clerical error.

 

        Suppress paragraphs 151 and 152 as the relative provisions converge in table A.

 

        Place the provisions referred to in the first part of paragraph 520 in place of those referred to in paragraph 332 and introduce the second part of paragraph 520 as an additional period of paragraph 138. Consequently, delete paragraph 520.

 

        In paragraph 362, paragraph 2-up to, sixth sentence, replace the word: "foresee"with the following: "to exclude" and the words: "differentiated methods of application of the regime restricting recruitment"with the following: "recruitment from the restrictive regime".

        Delete paragraph 409 identical to paragraph 410.

 

 

 

Previous articleBaretta (undersecretary of Economy): “Revenue monitoring is underway to verify the application of the 'safeguard clause'.
next articleZitro collaborates with the Filipino people