The lawyer Daniela Agnello, defender of StanleyBet Malta and Stanleyparma, commenting on the sentence of the Court of Justice states that this ruling opens up two different jurisdictional perspectives: «Year 2011/2015: the sentence appears to be in contrast with the jurisprudence rendered by the same Court of…

To read this article

Log in or register

Previous articleAnti-mafia in Lecce, "Final Blow" operation: clan ran clandestine gambling dens, pressures also ascertained to obtain concessions in winnings
next articleCassation on penalties for late payment of taxes due by the gaming concessionaire