"In the case of "a legitimate revocation, no responsibility in the proper sense on the part of the administration can be discerned, but an indemnity obligation weighs on it to be commensurate only with the emerging damage". This is how the Valle d'Aosta TAR expressed itself with the…

To read this article

Log in or register

Previous articleL'Aquila, new trade plan for the revitalization of the historic centre: cut out amusement arcades and betting centres
next articleUkraine. Parliament approves gambling law. Slot halls in hotels and regulation of lotteries