Perugia. Paragraph 6: operator wins in appeal against ADM

The operator had "trusted" a LED light that would have demonstrated the regular operation of the device. Of no relevance is the note from Snai to order the blocking of the device, sent only to the manager, nor the circumstance invoked by the unsuccessful Monopolies regarding the…

To read this article

Log in or register

Previous articleSNAI. In the first half of 2014, revenues grew by 4,2%. Declining revenues from slots and betting due to competition from CTDs
next articleUK, the Gambling Commission communicates the obligations required by the Gambling Act 2014