The Piedmont Tar rejected a series of appeals against the provisions of some Municipalities with which the owners of public establishments were informed of the presence, at a distance of less than 300 meters, of sensitive places. The judges have…

To read this article

Log in or register

Previous articleMesenzana (VA) says no to anti-slot ordinance. Mayor Rossi: we don't want to create difficulties for traders. Devices legitimated by national law
next articlePiedmont TAR ruling, Benelli: passed the principle according to which since it is known that gambling can harm health, it is not necessary to demonstrate the danger