With ordinance 4537/2021, the Court of Cassation clarifies the scope of the notion of "video terminal equipment", pursuant to art. 110, paragraph 9, letter. f-ter, TULPS. In this case, the Customs and Monopolies Agency had imposed an administrative sanction on a person...

To read this article

Log in or register

Previous articleIBIA: 64 betting integrity alerts in Q2021 XNUMX
next articleBan on gambling advertising. GBGC: "Italy, an example not to be followed"