(Jamma) "On the basis of what has been observed and of the public interest pursued, the distinction, on which the appellant insists, between the opening of a new gaming room and its mere transfer to another room, even at a short distance, cannot be shared" . Like this…

To read this article

Log in or register

Previous articleSlots, As.Tro and Acmi ask for the opening of a crisis table
next articleBrescia, M5S: "Slot room less than 150 meters from two churches, it must be closed"